State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting majority rule that bloodhound tracking evidence is admissible despite hearsay concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Epperly v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1982-09-09· cited 179×
• State v. Villagran
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 122×
• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-06· cited 47×
• State v. Buller
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1994-05-25· cited 31×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×
• State v. Weber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 19×
• State v. Streeper
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-12-10· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Michaux
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-12· cited 9×
• State v. Plankinton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-13· cited 6×
• State v. Porter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-10-17· cited 6×
• State v. Warner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-07-18· cited 5×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-08· cited 4×
• State v. Villagran
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-03-08· cited 1×
• State v. Wever
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Krummacher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-06-27· cited 170×
• State v. Welch
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-02-01· cited 84×
• State v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-01-21· cited 61×
• Terrell v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-03-12· cited 44×
• State v. Skinner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-03-25· cited 13×