State v. Harper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n officer’s retention of a person’s identification for investigatory purposes during ■ questioning restrains the person from leaving and, therefore, constitutes a stop.”
• nature of a noncoercive, consensual encounter “changed” into a stop when officer retained defendant’s identification because that act “restrains the person from leaving”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nyce
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 46×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-31· cited 42×
• State v. Kolb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-25· cited 20×
• State v. Webber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-28· cited 19×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 13×
• State v. Keerins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-09· cited 8×
• State v. Bostwick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-18· cited 3×
• State v. Nyce
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-06-29