Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/8/2020
State v. Marmon
Citations
- 303 Or. App. 469
- 463 P.3d 555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]nformation related to readily consumable drugs like heroin or marijuana is par- ticularly prone to staleness.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kamins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-07-24· cited 43×
- State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court· 1989-06-27· cited 38×
- State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-10-16· cited 23×
- State v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 19×
- State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-28· cited 19×
- State v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-02· cited 18×
- State v. Van OsdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 17×
- State v. CHAMU-HERNANDEZCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 12×
- State v. EvoniukCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-07-23· cited 12×
- State v. MituniewiczCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-01-29· cited 7×
- State v. BostwickCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-18· cited 3×
- State v. ShutvetCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.