Skip to main content

State v. Daniels

Citations

  • 243 P.3d 70
  • 349 Or. 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the value of an officer’s “training and experience” testimony often depends on whether the officer has persuasively explained the basis of his or her knowledge
  • addressing sufficiency of affiant officer’s “training and experience”-based averments regarding pedophiles’ purported retention of sexually explicit material over a period of several years
  • addressing sufficiency of affiant officer's \training and experience\-based averments regarding pedophiles' purported retention of sexually explicit material over a period of several years
  • knowledge that is based on common sense does not need any reference to training and experience
  • as officer’s testimony based on training and experience becomes more esoteric, specialized, counterintuitive, or scientific, increasingly persuasive explanation is necessary
  • “[T]he phrase ‘training and experience’ * * * is not a magical incantation with the power to imbue speculation, stereotype, or pseudoscience with an impenetrable armor of veracity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.