Oregon Supreme Court· 10/7/2010
State v. Daniels
Citations
- 243 P.3d 70
- 349 Or. 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the value of an officer’s “training and experience” testimony often depends on whether the officer has persuasively explained the basis of his or her knowledge
- addressing sufficiency of affiant officer’s “training and experience”-based averments regarding pedophiles’ purported retention of sexually explicit material over a period of several years
- addressing sufficiency of affiant officer's \training and experience\-based averments regarding pedophiles' purported retention of sexually explicit material over a period of several years
- knowledge that is based on common sense does not need any reference to training and experience
- as officer’s testimony based on training and experience becomes more esoteric, specialized, counterintuitive, or scientific, increasingly persuasive explanation is necessary
- “[T]he phrase ‘training and experience’ * * * is not a magical incantation with the power to imbue speculation, stereotype, or pseudoscience with an impenetrable armor of veracity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-25· cited 20×
- State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-28· cited 19×
- State v. Van OsdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 17×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-06· cited 17×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 17×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 13×
- State v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-12· cited 13×
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-07· cited 13×
- State v. LayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-06· cited 12×
- State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 12×
- State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-21· cited 10×
- State v. UlizziCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 7×
- State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-15· cited 7×
- State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 6×
- State v. TollCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-12· cited 1×
- State v. BeseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.