Skip to main content

State v. Agee

Citations

  • 358 Or. 325
  • 364 P.3d 971
  • 2015 Ore. LEXIS 890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a determination on intellectual disability is a mitigating factor that can be made by a judge and does not, under Apprendi and Ring, require a jury determination
  • rejecting a defendant’s attempt to convert absence of intellectual disability into element state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt
  • addressing issues likely to arise on remand in further penalty phase proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.