Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/24/2016
State v. Conrad
Citations
- 280 Or. App. 325
- 381 P.3d 880
- 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1009
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that record was sufficient to establish that the trial court conducted OEC 403 balancing where the defendant’s prejudice argument was limited in scope and thus “it is fair to conclude that the court understood the narrow question before it”
- noting that the defendant’s motion in limine sought to exclude the videos under ORS 136.420 and under OEC 403
- “[W]e are satisfied that the court implicitly balanced the ‘costs of the evidence against its benefits’ as is required by Mayfield”
- treating such a statement that way
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devore, Garrett, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-17· cited 17×
- State v. Lara-VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17· cited 12×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-02· cited 11×
- State v. HurtadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-23· cited 10×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-09· cited 7×
- Dep't of Human Servs. v. N. J. V. (In re A. N. O.-V.)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-07· cited 6×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-11· cited 6×
- State v. FudgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-05-30· cited 6×
- State v. Garcia-RocioCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-14· cited 5×
- State v. RockettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-11· cited 4×
- State v. YdrogoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 3×
- State v. SalsmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-22· cited 2×
- State v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-28· cited 2×
- State v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-04· cited 2×
- Case v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-09· cited 1×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-12-26· cited 1×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
- State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 151×
- State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 148×
- State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court· 2014-06-19· cited 47×
- State v. BorckCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-09· cited 22×
- State v. BrumwellOregon Supreme Court· 2011-03-25· cited 18×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 17×
- State v. BorckCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-25· cited 12×
- Department of Human Services v. B. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 12×
- State v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-01· cited 11×
- State v. SanderlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-24· cited 10×
- State v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 9×
- State v. MazziottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-09· cited 8×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-15· cited 6×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-03· cited 5×
- State v. McMullinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.