State of Oregon v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that restraints can impact a defendant’s “mental faculties[,] thereby-materially [abridging and prej- udicing] his constitutional rights of defense”
• recognizing that restraints can impact a defendant’s “mental faculties[,] thereby-materially [abridging and prej- udicing] his constitutional rights of defense”
• describing the myriad impacts that restraints may have on a defendant, includ- ing to one’s physical and mental faculties, and emphasizing the importance of exercising judicial discretion
• describing the myriad impacts that restraints may have on a defendant, includ- ing to one’s physical and mental faculties, and emphasizing the importance of exercising judicial discretion
• handcuffing the defendant during voir dire did not require reversal where potential jurors may not have seen handcuffs, defense counsel neither questioned or objected to any juror on that basis and where “there was reasonable grounds for precautions which were taken”
• handcuffing the defendant during voir dire did not require reversal where potential jurors may not have seen handcuffs, defense counsel neither questioned or objected to any juror on that basis and where \there was reasonable grounds for precautions which were taken\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).