Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/12/2016

State v. Bray

Citations

281 Or. App. 584
383 P.3d 883
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “actual possession refers to material in possession of the prosecu- tion itself, while constructive possession extends to material that is in the possession of others acting on the government’s behalf, * * * including the police”
explaining that “actual possession refers to material in possession of the prosecu- tion itself, while constructive possession extends to material that is in the possession of others acting on the government’s behalf, * * * including the police”
evidence is favorable if it is “directly excul- patory or could be used to impeach a government witness”
evidence is favorable if it is “directly excul- patory or could be used to impeach a government witness”
“We have found no authority for the proposition that Brady requires the prosecution to seek out or disclose evidence in the pos- session of private persons or institutions, * * * that cannot be considered part of the prosecutorial ‘team’. ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, Garrett, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.