Oregon Supreme Court· 12/31/2008
State v. Davis
Citations
- 201 P.3d 185
- 345 Or. 551
- 2008 Ore. LEXIS 1067
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the test for due process, preindictment delay “require[s] that a defendant show actual, not presumed, sub- stantial prejudice”
- due process claim requires “actual, not presumed, substantial prejudice”
- equating “effective” assistance with “adequate” assistance
- equating “effective” assistance with “adequate” assistance
- citingBowen, 340 Or at 508
- denial of motion to withdraw
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Linder, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court· 2013-03-14· cited 316×
- State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court· 2022-10-20· cited 196×
- Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court· 2014-03-20· cited 170×
- State v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-09· cited 85×
- Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-04-14· cited 73×
- State v. PerezOregon Supreme Court· 2025-05-01· cited 68×
- State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court· 2014-06-19· cited 47×
- Bogle v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2018-08-09· cited 39×
- Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-20· cited 38×
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court· 2012-03-29· cited 30×
- State v. PierpointCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-19· cited 25×
- State v. SpielerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 18×
- Lopez v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-09-13· cited 18×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-07· cited 16×
- State v. WellingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-17· cited 15×
- State v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-09· cited 15×
- Montez v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-22· cited 14×
- State v. StokesOregon Supreme Court· 2011-03-10· cited 13×
- Wade v. BrockampCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-07· cited 12×
- Davis v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-01· cited 12×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 2,170×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 1,098×
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,040×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 559×
- Wayne Dale Schell v. Larry Witek, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California, 1Ninth Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 247×
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 232×
- United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. FryeFifth Circuit· 1996-05-30· cited 155×
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court· 1992-09-17· cited 134×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Leo MORAN, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 126×
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 124×
- Benjamin Henderson Jones v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of VirginiaFourth Circuit· 1996-09-03· cited 113×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.