Oregon Supreme Court· 8/21/2014
State v. Walker
Citations
- 356 Or. 4
- 333 P.3d 316
- 2014 Ore. LEXIS 631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the legislature may choose language that effectuates a broader solution in an effort to more expan- sively address the specific problem spurring the legislation
- recognizing text and context of the statute as “the best indications of the leg- islature’s intent”
- noting that legislative history may reveal the legislature’s under- standing of a term
- noting that legislative history may reveal the legislature’s under- standing of a term
- observing that a word’s dictionary definition likely reflects the legislature’s intended meaning
- explaining that federal case law predating the enactment of an Oregon statute modeled on a federal statute provides useful context in construing our own statute; later case law is considered only for such persuasive value as it may have
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Linder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 2014-10-02· cited 168×
- State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court· 2015-09-17· cited 96×
- State v. HedgpethOregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-21· cited 85×
- State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-24· cited 71×
- State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court· 2017-04-20· cited 65×
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-12-26· cited 60×
- State v. DickersonOregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-12· cited 49×
- State v. AlthouseOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 39×
- Penn v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court· 2019-10-24· cited 32×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-30· cited 25×
- Deep Photonics Corp. v. LaChapelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-30· cited 24×
- Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court· 2016-08-04· cited 23×
- SAIF v. WardOregon Supreme Court· 2022-03-24· cited 22×
- State v. EggersOregon Supreme Court· 2024-10-24· cited 19×
- Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-02-16· cited 17×
- Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-31· cited 15×
- State v. AkinsOregon Supreme Court· 2025-04-17· cited 15×
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 14×
- State v. NascimentoOregon Supreme Court· 2016-07-21· cited 14×
- State v. EvensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-26· cited 13×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 823×
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 661×
- State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
- United States v. Darryl Freeman, Tyrone NettersNinth Circuit· 1993-09-22· cited 86×
- State v. CooperOregon Supreme Court· 1994-06-16· cited 40×
- State v. KurtzOregon Supreme Court· 2011-03-25· cited 35×
- South Beach Marina, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 35×
- Burke v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2012-09-27· cited 29×
- Hamilton v. PaynterOregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-07· cited 17×
- Reed v. ReedOregon Supreme Court· 1958-12-17· cited 12×
- Dickinson v. LeerOregon Supreme Court· 1970-03-11· cited 11×
- State v. CheekCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-02-14· cited 8×
- Clackamas County v. 102 Marijuana PlantsOregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-25· cited 5×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.