Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Oregon Supreme Court· 3/24/2022

SAIF v. Ward

Citations

  • 369 Or. 384
  • 506 P.3d 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that creates redundancy in the way that the statute is read”
  • explaining that “this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that creates redundancy in the way that the statute is read”
  • explaining that “this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that creates redundancy in the way that the statute is read”
  • explaining that the context of a statute includes related statutes
  • “The context of a statute includes other provisions of the same statute and related statutes, as well as the preexisting common law and the statutory frame- work within which the statute was enacted.” (Internal quo- tation marks omitted.)
  • “[W]hen construing a stat- ute to determine the intent of the legislature, this court will generally attempt to avoid a statutory construction that cre- ates redundancy in the way that the statute is read.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named SAIF v. Ward

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.