Skip to main content

Burke v. State

Citations

  • 352 Or. 428
  • 290 P.3d 790
  • 2012 Ore. LEXIS 673
  • 2012 WL 5285702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing variations in use of disjunctive “or” and concluding that while it often indicates an exclusive relationship, legislature may also use “or” inclusively
  • distinguishing transfer of legal title by deed from transfers of other nonpossessory interests such as mortgages and easements
  • describing variations in use of disjunctive “or” and concluding that while it often indicates an exclusive relationship, legislature may also use “or” inclusively
  • describing variations in use of disjunctive “or” and concluding that while it often indicates an exclusive relationship, legislature may also use “or” inclusively
  • providing the example that, “[i]f a person is told that, ‘on Thursday, Mary will be in Eugene or in Boston,’ it is clear that the ‘or’ is being used in its exclusive sense”
  • unlikely that legislature uses the same term in the same sentence to mean different things

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer, De Muniz, Durham, Kistler, Linder, Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.