State v. Cheek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is apparent that the legislature wanted to include every kind of enterprise within the definition of ORS 166.715(2).” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ball
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-20· cited 87×
• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 81×
• State v. Gaines
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-10-25· cited 28×
• State v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 10×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-04· cited 5×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Turkette
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
• United States v. Elliott
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-04-21· cited 305×
• United States v. Bledsoe
  Eighth Circuit· 1982-03-12· cited 236×
• United States v. George I. Benny
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-04-15· cited 173×
• Habib v. Raytheon Co.
  Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 161×
• United States v. Francis William Hewes, Ii, Gene M. Simpson, Millard Clifford Haley, Walter Langford, and Howard E. Caldwell
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-04-16· cited 106×
• United States v. Paul Mazzei
  Second Circuit· 1983-05-23· cited 93×
• Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-24· cited 79×
• Fruehauf Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-11-06· cited 46×
• State v. Blossom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-10-21· cited 16×
• Computer Concepts, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Brandt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 5×
• Mazzei v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 3×
• Benny v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1986-12-15· cited 3×