Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a statute’s con- text includes judicial “decisions that existed at the time that the legislature enacted” the statute at issue
• noting that “reasonable diligence” requires agency to engage in value judgment about what is “reasonable” and what is “diligence” under the circumstances of each case
• explaining that a statute’s con- text includes judicial “decisions that existed at the time that the legislature enacted” the statute at issue
• noting that case law existing at the time of a statute’s enactment is part of the statutory context
• observing that, under the statute, lack of knowledge arguably is an affir- mative defense rather than an element that OR-OSHA must prove; reserving burden of proof question
• explaining that case law existing at the time of enactment interpreting the text of a statute borrowed from another jurisdiction “may be consulted” as Cite as 371 Or 340 (2023) 355 context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).