Clackamas County v. 102 Marijuana Plants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where legislative findings pertaining to the legislature’s particular reasons for enacting relevant statute were not referred to in operative section of statute, court gave effect to broad language in latter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 81×
• State v. McNally
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-04-20· cited 65×
• Burke v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-09-27· cited 29×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Curran
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-02· cited 40×
• Clackamas County v. 102 Marijuana Plants
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-07· cited 1×

Other cases named Clackamas County v. 102 Marijuana Plants

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Clackamas County v. 102 Marijuana Plants
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-07· cited 1×