· 12/24/2015
State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuela
Citations
- 358 Or. 451
- 365 P.3d 116
- 2015 Ore. LEXIS 928
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a defendant’s closing argument in a bench trial that challenges the sufficiency of the evidence is the equivalent of an MJOA
- observing that the legislature has used the simple present tense throughout Oregon’s criminal code to signify “timeless legal facts”
- noting that dictionary definitions may provide a useful starting point for our tex- tual analysis
- explaining that “a stat- ute’s plain meaning is frequently more than the sum of its individually defined terms”
- explaining that a term’s use in a particular context “may dictate applying one definition rather than another, if the dictionary contains multiple defi- nitions for a relevant term”
- discussing, in context of child endangerment statute, \the harm a minor experiences from being in a particular place associated with drug activity\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Linder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.