Skip to main content
· 12/24/2015

State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuela

Citations

  • 358 Or. 451
  • 365 P.3d 116
  • 2015 Ore. LEXIS 928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a defendant’s closing argument in a bench trial that challenges the sufficiency of the evidence is the equivalent of an MJOA
  • observing that the legislature has used the simple present tense throughout Oregon’s criminal code to signify “timeless legal facts”
  • noting that dictionary definitions may provide a useful starting point for our tex- tual analysis
  • explaining that “a stat- ute’s plain meaning is frequently more than the sum of its individually defined terms”
  • explaining that a term’s use in a particular context “may dictate applying one definition rather than another, if the dictionary contains multiple defi- nitions for a relevant term”
  • discussing, in context of child endangerment statute, \the harm a minor experiences from being in a particular place associated with drug activity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.