Nebraska Supreme Court· 12/14/2018

State v. Tucker

Citations

301 Neb. 856
920 N.W.2d 680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[e]vidence is relevant if it tends in any degree to alter the probability of a material fact”
1-in-1,842 chance of coincidental match did not render Y-STR DNA evidence unreliable so as to justify withholding it from jury
“[e]vidence is relevant if it tends in any degree to alter the probability of a material fact”
“[e]vidence is relevant if it tends in any degree to alter the probability of a material fact”
Y-STR DNA test results admissible where \accompanied by the required statistical context\
explaining value of Y-STR DNA is like shoe imprint evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heavican, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, Freudenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Tucker

365 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.