Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/30/2002

State v. Shields

Citations

56 P.3d 937
184 Or. App. 505
2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

even though a telephone call is typically analyzed as an expressive contact, causing a telephone to ring without speaking is a nonexpressive contact
motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of evidence must raise specific theory as to why state’s evidence was insufficient or the argument is not preserved for appeal
argument that one particular element of stalking statute was not proven (threatening communication) was not sufficient to preserve an argument that a different element of the statute (requirement of objectively reasonable alarm) was not shown
argument that one particular element of stalking statute was not proven (threatening communication) was not sufficient to preserve an argument that a different element of the statute (requirement of objectively reasonable alarm) was not shown
upholding a conviction for stalking where a friend turned hostile
“making telephone calls without speaking” is not protected speech

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Deits, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.