Washington Supreme Court· 10/27/1988

State v. Sargent

Citations

762 P.2d 1127
111 Wash. 2d 641
1988 Wash. LEXIS 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that probation officer was “clearly the agent of the State in this transaction”
emphasizing that the critical inquiry is whether the suspect's \freedom of movement was restricted\
State violated the defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights when a probation officer preparing a sentencing statement failed to give the defendant Miranda warnings and assistance of counsel
State violated the defendant’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights when a probation officer preparing a sentencing statement failed to give the defendant Miranda warnings and assistance of counsel
\freedom of movement\ is determinative of \custody\ for Miranda purposes
\freedom of movement” is determinative of \custody” for Miranda purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dore, Andersen, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.