Supreme Court· 5/15/1967
In Re GAULT
Citations
- 387 U.S. 1
- 87 S. Ct. 1428
- 18 L. Ed. 2d 527
- 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1478
- 40 Ohio Op. 2d 378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that many constitutional procedural rights ordinarily associated with criminal trials apply in juvenile delinquency proceedings
- recognizing that the juvenile system was developed in large part to facilitate the opportunity for juveniles to reform and become productive citizens
- holding that many constitutional procedural rights ordinarily associated with criminal trials apply in juvenile delinquency proceedings
- holding that the Fifth Amendment applies to juveniles and may be “claimed in any proceeding, be it criminal or civil, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory”
- holding that due process requires reasonably particular notice in juvenile cases
- holding that the Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights 10 apply to children.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fortas, Black, White, Hablan, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3,961 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 3,250×
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court· 2007-05-14· cited 3,241×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 2,975×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court· 1993-03-23· cited 2,046×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,706×
Cites
75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 1,935×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 1,617×
Other cases named In Re GAULT
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.