Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/30/1997
State v. D.R.
Citations
- 84 Wash. App. 832
- 930 P.2d 350
- 1997 Wash. App. LEXIS 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that juvenile suspect was in custody when summoned to assistant principal's office and interviewed by plain clothes officer, because \a reasonable 14-year-old in D.R.'s position would have reasonably supposed his freedom of action was curtailed\
- holding that juvenile suspect was in custody when summoned to assistant principal's office and interviewed by plain clothes officer, because \a reasonable 14-year-old in D.R.'s position would have reasonably supposed his freedom of action was curtailed\
- xplaining that the proper standard is a reasonable person standard, but also noti g that the suspect testified that he did not believe he was free to leave
- 14-year-old interrogated by plain-clothed police officer in assistant principal’s office with assistant principal and social worker and told he did not have to answer questions was still in custody
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re L.M.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-15· cited 86×
- In Re Interest of Tyler F.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-09-05· cited 55×
- State v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-07-17· cited 51×
- Michael Alvarado v. R.Q. Hickman, Warden, Acting Warden of Mule Creek State PrisonNinth Circuit· 2002-12-18· cited 46×
- In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-13· cited 24×
- State v. BirnelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-13· cited 22×
- City of College Place v. StaudenmaierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-28· cited 22×
- J.D. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-01-28· cited 18×
- State v. NasonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-25· cited 10×
- In Re Jorge D.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-04-09· cited 10×
- State v. SJWCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-04-27· cited 7×
- State v. S.J.W.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-04-27· cited 7×
- State v. RehnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-29· cited 6×
- In Re the Welfare of R.J.E.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-09-11· cited 3×
- In Re IJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-17· cited 1×
- In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-18· cited 1×
- JD v. Com.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-01-28
- State v. DRCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-30
- In Re IJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-13
- In Re LMTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-05-20
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- State v. PostWashington Supreme Court· 1992-09-10· cited 230×
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court· 1988-02-18· cited 225×
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-02· cited 129×
- State v. SargentWashington Supreme Court· 1988-10-27· cited 100×
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-17· cited 55×
- State v. ReubenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-08-27· cited 45×
- State v. ShortWashington Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 44×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. LoredoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-22· cited 37×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. KillitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-10-13· cited 23×
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.