Washington Supreme Court· 5/9/2002

State v. Sanchez

Citations

146 Wash. 2d 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that community corrections officers who are appointed by the court to make sentencing recommendations are not parties to the prosecutor's agreement with the defendant, and may advocate for a position opposite from that of the prosecutor
holding that community corrections officers who are appointed by the court to make sentencing recommendations are not parties to the prosecutor’s agreement with the defendant, and may advocate for a position opposite from that of the prosecutor
allowing oral argument by community correction officer despite not being specifically listed within the statute
“ ‘[T]he prosecutor and the defendant are the only parties to a plea agreement.’ ” (alteration in original
“ ‘The court shall... allow arguments from ... an investigative law enforcement officer as to the sentence to be imposed’ ” (first alteration in original
'\The court shall ... allow arguments from ... an investigative law enforcement officer as to the sentence to be imposed\ (first alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridge, Chambers, Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.