Supreme Court· 6/10/1974

Michigan v. Tucker

Citations

417 U.S. 433
94 S. Ct. 2357
41 L. Ed. 2d 182
1974 U.S. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding admissible the physical fruits of a Miranda violation
allowing testimony of a third-party although the police procured such testimony as the fruit of the defendant’s voluntary statement made after an incomplete warning
\[I]n Miranda ... the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination was seen as the principal protection for a person facing police interrogation.\
“the exclusionary rule’s ‘prime purpose is to deter future unlawful police misconduct’ ”
testimony of witness discovered through Miranda violation not barred by Miranda rule
identity of a witness discovered during an un-Miran-dized but otherwise voluntary interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rehnquist, Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell, Brennan, Marshall, White, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

945 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Michigan v. Tucker

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.