Washington Supreme Court· 9/10/1992

State v. Post

Citations

837 P.2d 599
118 Wash. 2d 596
1992 Wash. LEXIS 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

upholding use of psychologist’s evaluation based on interview conducted 8 years prior to conviction
where this court affirmed the defendant's exceptional sentence of 180 months based solely on the trial court's finding of future dangerousness
where this court affirmed the defendant's exceptional sentence of 180 months based solely on the trial court's finding of future dangerousness
“defendant must show some objective facts indicating his . . . freedom of movement [or action] was restricted [or curtailed]”
protection of the public is invalid as a separate aggravating factor because it \is the very rationale of the future dangerousness factor\
protection of the public is invalid as a separate aggravating factor because it \is the very rationale of the future dangerousness factor\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.