Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/30/2004
State v. Rivera
Citations
- 83 P.3d 69
- 207 Ariz. 69
- 418 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a passenger grabbing and turning a steering wheel assumed actual physical control for purposes of DUI statute
- “[A] person who drives a vehicle actually physically controls it; driving is a subset of actual physical control.”
- “[W]e conclude that, a passenger who grabs the steering wheel of a moving car and alters the car’s movement has assumed actual physical control for purposes of the DUI statutes.”
- “These cases broadly demonstrate that by including ‘actual physical control,’ the legislature intended to extend the DUI statutes to encompass those situations in which a person who is not actually driving nonetheless poses an equivalent risk.”
- passenger grabbing steering wheel of car has exercised actual physical control
- right to notice under Arizona Constitution equivalent to Sixth Amendment right
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Espinosa, Pelander, Eckerstrom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Penny Ann WestCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-11-13· cited 32×
- State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court· 2009-06-03· cited 26×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-27· cited 8×
- State v. CheramieCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-11-30· cited 4×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2013-02-22· cited 3×
- State v. ZaragozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-10· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Michael Lorenzo RiveraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-27
- State of Arizona v. Enis John Cheramie, IIICourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-11-30
- State of Arizona v. Penny Ann WestCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-11-20
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court· 1937-01-04· cited 831×
- Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 757×
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 207×
- State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-31· cited 77×
- State v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-16· cited 76×
- State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court· 1954-09-27· cited 73×
- State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court· 1958-01-23· cited 64×
- State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-30· cited 61×
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-21· cited 59×
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HokansonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-10-06· cited 51×
- State v. BlakleyArizona Supreme Court· 2003-03-27· cited 45×
- In re United States Currency in the Amount of $315,900.00Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-08-22· cited 45×
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-22· cited 44×
- State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-07· cited 41×
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court· 1988-07-19· cited 35×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1967-01-18· cited 33×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-08-24· cited 25×
- State v. LoveArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 23×
- State v. MikelsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-06-08· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.