Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/21/1993
Atkinson v. State
Citations
- 627 A.2d 1019
- 331 Md. 199
- 1993 Md. LEXIS 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the view among many states is that the purpose of the “actual physical control” language in DWI provisions is preventive, aimed to protect the public from what inebriated individuals “might” do (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “When interpreting a statute, we assume that words have there ordinary and natural meaning.”
- similar “actual physical control” provision encompasses “directing influence” on a vehicle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chasanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-23· cited 136×
- State v. RaskNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-08-26· cited 106×
- Maryland Division of Labor & Industry v. Triangle General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-06· cited 57×
- State v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-06-08· cited 55×
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-18· cited 43×
- City of Naperville v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-02-20· cited 37×
- Belote v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-13· cited 36×
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-08· cited 36×
- Pacheco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-12· cited 34×
- Maryland House of Correction v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-15· cited 30×
- State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court· 2009-06-03· cited 26×
- Herd v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-24· cited 26×
- State v. HaightSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-22· cited 26×
- Bruno v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-17· cited 25×
- State v. LoveArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 23×
- Annapolis Market Place, L.L.C. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-07-18· cited 23×
- United States v. McFarlandFirst Circuit· 2006-04-12· cited 18×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-10· cited 18×
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. AtterbearyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-09· cited 17×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-30· cited 17×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- NCR Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-29· cited 96×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-05-13· cited 83×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-31· cited 72×
- State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-10-18· cited 69×
- Matter of ClaytonIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-01-07· cited 60×
- Richmond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-13· cited 56×
- Management Personnel Services, Inc. v. SandefurCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-16· cited 56×
- State v. GhylinNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 54×
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-22· cited 50×
- State v. SchulerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-06-11· cited 43×
- State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-07· cited 41×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-12· cited 39×
- City of Cincinnati v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1976-07-14· cited 38×
- Ex Parte City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama· 1986-09-19· cited 32×
- State v. BuggerUtah Supreme Court· 1971-04-06· cited 30×
- Adams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1985-04-09· cited 27×
- People v. CummingsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-11-07· cited 24×
- Key v. Town of KinseyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-12-28· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.