Skip to main content
· 11/16/2000

State v. Rosengren

Citations

  • 14 P.3d 303
  • 199 Ariz. 112
  • 334 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
  • 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting deference only to “the trial court’s factual findings that are supported by the record”
  • reviewing court defers to trial court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence supports them
  • “possible signs of alcohol impairment” included “slurred speech, a noticeable stagger while walking, and a sideways body sway”
  • when reviewing motion to suppress evidence, “[w]e defer to the trial court’s 7 factual findings that are supported by the record and not clearly erroneous”
  • State permitted to voluntarily dismiss charges and appeal an order suppressing defendant’s statements and DUI test results
  • suppression required only when “causal connection exists between a constitutional violation and the government‟s obtaining of [the] evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Brammer, Flórez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.