Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/24/2000

State v. Johnson

Citations

8 P.3d 1159
198 Ariz. 245
2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the appellant bears the burden of proving actual prejudice from an amendment
stating that the appellant bears the burden of proving actual prejudice from an amendment
finding that an amendment, after State rested, to conform with testimony about acts different from those alleged was prejudicial 6Rule 16.1(b) states that all motions should be made “no later than 20 days prior to trial, or at such other time as the court may direct.” Ariz. R. Crim. P. 16.1(b
“To be meaningful, an ‘ample opportunity to prepare to defend’ against amended charges generally must occur before the state has rested its case.” (citation omitted)
defendant must show indictment as amended violates his or her right to double jeopardy protection
prejudice existed because the defendant was prevented from challenging an inconsistent statement or conducting a proper cross examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flórez, Pelander, Druke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.