Skip to main content
· 8/9/1977

State v. Blakley

Citations

  • 568 P.2d 270
  • 90 N.M. 744
  • 1977 NMCA 088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of photograph of the victim’s body was proper because it “illustrated, clarified, and corroborated the testimony of various witnesses”
  • holding that admission of photograph of the victim’s body was proper because it “illustrated, clarified, and corroborated the testimony of various witnesses”
  • determining that there had been no abuse of discretion where 10 photographs of the victim’s body and the defendant’s vehicle were admitted into 11 evidence in vehicular homicide prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Hendley, Hernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.