Arizona Supreme Court· 6/27/1995
State v. Love
Citations
- 897 P.2d 626
- 182 Ariz. 324
- 193 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
- 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 53
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing “obvious statutoiy aim of enabling the drunken driver to be apprehended before he maims or kills himself or someone else” [emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted]
- noting that \actual physical control\ does not require \the apparent ability to start and move a vehicle\
- stating factors to be considered include whether engine running, ignition turned on, and where key is located
- recognizing legislative goal to prevent threat of harm to public
- rejecting suggestion that cases should turn on whether engine is running and vehicle is pulled entirely off the road
- factfinder should “weigh the myriad of circumstances” in each case to determine whether defendant “presented a danger to himself or others”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zlaket, Moeller, Feldman, Martone, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-10-01· cited 32×
- State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court· 2009-06-03· cited 26×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-30· cited 17×
- State v. VialpandoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2004-04-01· cited 14×
- State v. CyrSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-03-31· cited 13×
- State of Arizona v. William Peter MoranCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-07-31· cited 13×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-06-22· cited 11×
- State v. DawleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-11-15· cited 10×
- State v. TarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-08-05· cited 10×
- State v. Superior Court of StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-10-14· cited 8×
- State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. BrownArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. KissMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-09-09· cited 8×
- United States v. McFarlandD. Maine· 2005-05-09· cited 6×
- Potter v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-12-24· cited 6×
- State v. ZaragozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-10· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Daniel Heriberto RiveraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-30
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LawrenceTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-03-01· cited 82×
- State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court· 1954-09-27· cited 73×
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-21· cited 59×
- State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-07· cited 41×
- Ex Parte City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama· 1986-09-19· cited 32×
- State v. SUPER. CT., GREENLEE COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-17· cited 12×
- State v. VermueleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-01-31· cited 10×
- State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. BrownArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 8×
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. MartoneArizona Supreme Court· 1993-04-27· cited 7×
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.