New Mexico Supreme Court· 12/2/2003

State v. Rivera

Citations

82 P.3d 939
134 N.M. 768
2004 NMSC 001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that this Court “would be exceeding the bounds of our role as an appellate court by second-guessing the clear policy of the Legislature” (emphasis added)
noting that this Court \would be exceeding the bounds of our role as an appellate court by second-guessing the clear policy of the Legislature\ (emphasis added)
explaining that when construing a statute, a court must ensure that no part of a statute is rendered surplusage or meaningless
stating that the board was entitled to correct the procedural defect of failing to comply with the Act
explaining that when construing a statute, a court must ensure that no part of a statute is rendered surplusage or meaningless
stating that the board was entitled to correct the procedural defect of failing to comply with the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minzner, Jimenez, Maes, Serna, Bosson, Chávez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Rivera

294 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.