Arizona Supreme Court· 7/19/1988

State v. Arnett

Citations

760 P.2d 1064
158 Ariz. 15
13 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
1988 Ariz. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant cannot be convicted of both premeditated murder and felony murder
holding that a defendant cannot be convicted of both murder after deliberation and felony murder
holding that a defendant cannot be convicted of both murder after deliberation and felony murder
holding that a defendant cannot be convicted of both murder after deliberation and felony murder
emphasizing that although expert testimony is admissible to establish personality trait of acting without reflection, testimony of a defendant’s probable state of mind at time of the offense is not permitted
finding indictment gave sufficient notice even though defendant did not learn the state’s theories of prosecution until day of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Gordon, Feldman, Holohan, Moeller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.