Washington Supreme Court· 2/7/1983

State v. Rice

Citations

655 P.2d 1145
98 Wash. 2d 384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that punishment is the paramount purpose of the adult sentencing system, while the juvenile system “has not utterly abandoned the rehabilitative ideal”
describing JJA as “an effort to overcome the inadequacies of the juvenile justice system,” but not “a rigidly punitive system which mirrors in every respect the adult criminal justice system”
emphasizing juvenile system was not created as “rigidly punitive” parallel to adult system
under Const, art. 1, § 12, the freedom from physical restraint is a fundamental interest for the purpose of equal protection analysis
physical liberty a fundamental interest and strict scrutiny must be applied but statute at issue satisfied test
physical liberty a fundamental interest and strict scrutiny must be applied but statute at issue satisfied test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson, Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.