Washington Supreme Court· 4/24/1980
State v. Smith
Citations
- 610 P.2d 869
- 93 Wash. 2d 329
- 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a possible 5-year sentence for felonious possession of marijuana does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment
- holding that a possible 5-year sentence for felonious possession of marijuana does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment
- finding that marijuana use “creates a euphoric state of intoxication which impedes learning, incentive, efficiency, and, importantly, motor coordination”
- decided prior to Plyler v. Doe, supra; noting confusion and rejecting enhanced scrutiny in favor of rational relationship test
- decided prior to Plyler v. Doe, supra ; noting confusion and rejecting enhanced scrutiny in favor of rational relationship test
- “if the affidavit or testimony reveals nothing more than a declaration of suspicion and belief, it is legally insufficient”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosellini, Dolliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-04· cited 373×
- State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court· 1984-09-13· cited 276×
- State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court· 1981-07-30· cited 263×
- Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-20· cited 228×
- State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court· 1992-11-12· cited 220×
- State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 195×
- State v. FainWashington Supreme Court· 1980-10-02· cited 170×
- State v. CordWashington Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 166×
- State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 166×
- State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 154×
- State v. ColeWashington Supreme Court· 1995-12-07· cited 138×
- Christen v. LeeWashington Supreme Court· 1989-10-26· cited 138×
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-07· cited 114×
- State v. PhelanWashington Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 110×
- Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 105×
- Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1993-01-21· cited 99×
- State v. FramptonWashington Supreme Court· 1981-04-16· cited 97×
- State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court· 1992-12-10· cited 82×
- State v. HirschfelderWashington Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 78×
- Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 76×
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 2,234×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 1,494×
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 1,230×
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-12-04· cited 852×
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court· 1929-11-25· cited 432×
- Delph v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-11-06· cited 338×
- United States v. OritoSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 324×
- People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-05-09· cited 228×
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-05-28· cited 199×
- Albert Lopez Gallego v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1960-03-23· cited 189×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.