Skip to main content
· 1/21/1988

O'DAY v. King County

Citations

  • 749 P.2d 142
  • 109 Wash. 2d 796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the federal test for overbreadth but finding more protection if overbreadth rises to the level of a prior restraint
  • article I, section 5 provides greater protection against prior restraints and overbreadth than the First Amendment
  • article I, section 5 provides greater protection against prior restraints and overbreadth than the First Amendment
  • one-year revocation of topless dancing license did not negate remedial intention of ordinance
  • one-year revocation of topless dancing license did not negate remedial intention of ordinance
  • specific exemptions for nonobscene exhibitions and dances cure possible overbreadth infirmities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.