Skip to main content

State v. McCarter

Citations

  • 588 P.2d 745
  • 91 Wash. 2d 249
  • 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “petitioner lacked standing to attack the constitutionality of the statute” because “[o]ne cannot urge the invalidity of a statute unless harmed by the particular feature which is challenged”
  • finding that \petitioner lacked standing to attack the constitutionality ofthe statute\ because \[o]ne cannot urge the invalidity of a statute unless harmed by the particular feature which is challenged\
  • finding that \petitioner lacked standing to attack the constitutionality ofthe statute\ because \[o]ne cannot urge the invalidity of a statute unless harmed by the particular feature which is challenged\
  • no logical reason for treating prisoners transferred from prison differently than offenders sent directly to a mental hospital by the sentencing court
  • “One cannot urge the invalidity of a statute unless harmed by the particular feature which is challenged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dolliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.