Skip to main content

State v. Gaines

Citations

  • 859 P.2d 36
  • 122 Wash. 2d 502
  • 1993 Wash. LEXIS 245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting drug addiction as valid mitigating factor because fails it to \distinguish the defendant's crime from others in the same category\
  • requiring resentencing where exceptional sentence premised on multiple factors and it was unclear whether the court would have departed from the standard range based on valid factor alone
  • comparison of length of standard range and exceptional sentence below the range appropriate in considering whether exceptional sentence is clearly too lenient
  • remand necessary when the appellate court is not confident the trial court would impose the same sentence on reconsideration
  • statutory mitigating factor of minor involvement may support an exceptional sentence in a drug case
  • trial court cited the defendant’s minor role as a mitigating factor, but the State challenged only findings regarding drug addiction and the purposes of the SRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.