In Re the Personal Restraint of Carle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court that imposed an erroneous sentence “has both the power and the duty to correct it”
• determining that a sentence in excess of statutory authority is a \fundamental defect\ that permits a collateral attack on sentences in a PRP
• \remanded to the trial court for the purpose of resentencing petitioner nunc pro tunc in accordance with this opinion\
• \remanded to the trial court for the purpose of resentencing petitioner nunc pro tunc in accordance with this opinion\
• a finding that the trial court relied on an improper factor does not render the entire sentence invalid
• a finding that the trial court relied on an improper factor does not render the entire sentence invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).