Washington Supreme Court· 4/7/2003
State v. Barnes
Citations
- 818 P.2d 1088
- 117 Wash. 2d 701
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding finding of future dangerousness insufficient aggravating factor to justify exceptional sentence in nonsexual offense cases
- recognizing distinction of adult and juvenile systems on this basis
- recognizing distinction of adult and juvenile systems on this basis
- pluralities constituting a majority agree that future dangerousness can be used only in sexual offenses
- “In enacting the SRA, the Legislature changed our criminal sentencing system from an indeterminate, rehabilitation-oriented system to a determinate system, having punishment as its primary purpose.”
- discussing the unreliability involved in predicting future dangerousness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Utter, Guy, Dolliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 350×
- State v. PostWashington Supreme Court· 1992-09-10· cited 230×
- State v. Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-13· cited 186×
- State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court· 1996-10-24· cited 160×
- State v. StraussWashington Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 143×
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 133×
- State v. Shawn P.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 120×
- State v. LawWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-21· cited 113×
- State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 102×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 102×
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-10-28· cited 84×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 72×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-27· cited 67×
- State v. GainesWashington Supreme Court· 1993-10-07· cited 67×
- State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-02· cited 55×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of VandervlugtWashington Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 54×
- State v. FreitagWashington Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 53×
- State v. NegreteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-14· cited 45×
- Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court· 2011-05-12· cited 41×
- State v. BedkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-02· cited 37×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1978-09-07· cited 578×
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 328×
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 272×
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 224×
- State v. PryorWashington Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 117×
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-07· cited 114×
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 111×
- State v. McAlpinWashington Supreme Court· 1987-07-16· cited 104×
- State v. BatistaWashington Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 94×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of WhiteselWashington Supreme Court· 1988-10-27· cited 58×
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-06· cited 49×
- State v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-05-13· cited 27×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-07· cited 26×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-23· cited 24×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-28· cited 15×
- State v. WorlCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-07-12· cited 14×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-07-30· cited 12×
- State v. VandervlugtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-08· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.