Washington Supreme Court· 3/21/1991

State v. Ray

Citations

806 P.2d 1220
116 Wash. 2d 531
1991 Wash. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \crimes of theft involve dishonesty and are perse admissible for impeachment purposes under ER 609(a)(2)\
stating that one purpose of an offer of proof is to \inform[] the judge of the specific nature of the offered evidence so that the court can assess its admissibility\ (emphasis added)
stating that one purpose of an offer of proof is to “inform! ] the judge of the specific nature of the offered evidence so that the court can assess its admissibility” (emphasis added)
stating that, under ER 103(a)(2) an offer of proof is generally required in order for the court to make an informed ruling on the admissibility of evidence
holding theft is a crime of dishonesty
a trial court’s erroneous admission of evidence is harmless if the evidence did not materially affect the outcome of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dore, Dolliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Ray

215 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.