Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 8/24/2010
State v. Valentine
Citations
- 787 N.W.2d 630
- 2010 Minn. App. LEXIS 129
- 2010 WL 3304310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Minn. Stat. § 634.20 (2008) authorized the admission of evidence of domestic abuse against an ex-girlfriend
- holding that improper prior-police-contacts testimony was not prejudicial because it was “incidental” and the evidence of guilt was overwhelming
- explaining that testimony that officer knows defendant from prior contacts “is error if the defendant’s identity is not an issue in the case”
- reasoning that a defendant’s treatment 10 of his family is probative of how a defendant interacts with those close to him, including the victim
- stating that police officer 6 qualified as an expert witness in battered-woman syndrome by virtue of law-enforcement experience, role as a probation officer, training in domestic-violence issues, and education
- rejecting the appellant’s argument that “other family or household members” refers to those of the victim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Minge, Hudson, Muehlberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Darron WareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-12-08
- State of Minnesota v. Jairo Missael Fernandez SortoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-09-09
- State of Minnesota v. Shawn Eric ClementCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-04-22
- Jason Lamar Forest v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-06
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 451×
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-14· cited 347×
- State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-03-27· cited 188×
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-08-12· cited 184×
- State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-08· cited 147×
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-12-06· cited 122×
- State v. MayhornSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-31· cited 101×
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-01· cited 98×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-29· cited 88×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-07-19· cited 74×
- State v. GrecingerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-09-18· cited 74×
- State v. RittSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-08-05· cited 62×
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-17· cited 56×
- State v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-21· cited 43×
- State v. KoskelaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-01· cited 41×
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-22· cited 39×
- State v. AsfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-06-12· cited 30×
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-05-18· cited 14×
- State v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-08-18· cited 14×
- Koch v. Mork Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.