Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/31/2008

State v. Jones

Citations

753 N.W.2d 677
2008 Minn. LEXIS 367
2008 WL 2917637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that jurors may consider their own experiences in evaluating the evidence presented
explaining that the unobjected-to prosecutorial misconduct was not “clear” or “obvious” where no court had “conclusively resolved” the issue in question
holding prosecutor’s 15 explanation of reasonable doubt standard using beyond “all possibility of doubt” was proper
noting that it would be improper for prosecutor to comment on defendant’s refusal to give saliva sample
noting that it would be improper for prosecutor to comment on defendant’s refusal to give saliva sample
noting that defendant’s “credibility was seriously undermined by the inconsistent statements he made to police and his admission that he perjured himself in the first trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dietzen, Magnuson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.