Skip to main content

State v. Lindsey

Citations

  • 755 N.W.2d 752
  • 2008 Minn. App. LEXIS 344
  • 2008 WL 4006695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “significant probative value” of relationship evidence “in assisting the jury to judge witness credibility”
  • stating that cautionary instructions lessened the probability that the jury would give undue weight to relationship evidence
  • noting that relationship evidence has “significant probative value in assisting the jury to judge witness credibility”
  • stating that evidence of the appellant’s conduct “had significant probative value in assisting the jury to judge witness credibility”
  • determining that relationship evidence “had significant probative value in assisting the jury to judge witness credibility”
  • stating that evidence that places an event in context of the relationship between the victim and the defendant “bolsters its probative value” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kalitowski, Hudson, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.