Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/19/1993

State v. Johnson

Citations

498 N.W.2d 10
1993 Minn. LEXIS 222
1993 WL 75982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the defendant’s claim fails under the [second] of the Barker considerations . . . principally because his own motions were the primary reason for much of the delay”
stating that “when the overall delay in bringing a case to trial is the result of the defendant’s actions, there is no speedy trial violation”
attributing bulk of trial delay to defendant whose “own motions were the primary reason for much of the delay”
attributing bulk of trial delay to defendant whose “own motions were the primary reason for much of the delay”
attributing only 16 days of 629-day delay to state, while attributing remainder of 629-day delay to defendant’s motions
attributing bulk of trial delay to defendant whose “own motions were the primary reason for much of the delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simonett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.