State v. Ray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts “construe general and specific statutes that cover the same subject matter so as to give effect to both, if possible,” and “apply the more specific statute when the two conflict”
• distinguishing non- appealable judgment and imposition of probation after acceptance of plea from appealable order imposing sentence after contested violation hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-05-07· cited 17×
• State v. Dean
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-09· cited 12×
• State v. Piotrowski
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-01-14· cited 5×
• State v. Ceasar
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-10-04· cited 3×
• State of Arizona v. John George Ponsart Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-06-11

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bolton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
• State v. Thues
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-24· cited 72×
• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-11-26· cited 49×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-06-27· cited 45×
• State v. Cazares
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-07-11· cited 31×
• State v. Contreras
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-17· cited 30×
• State v. Holguin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-04· cited 18×
• State v. Campa
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 13×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-30· cited 9×