Nebraska Supreme Court· 9/25/1992
State v. Ray
Citations
- 489 N.W.2d 558
- 241 Neb. 551
- 1992 Neb. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant’s statement is inadmissible if totality of the circumstances shows that police offered -a benefit in exchange for a statement
- determination that statement made voluntarily not disturbed unless clearly wrong
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
- State v. GarnerNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-07-21· cited 78×
- State v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-04-29· cited 44×
- State v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-12-24· cited 39×
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-06-30· cited 22×
- State v. RayNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-08-22· cited 10×
- State v. CaseNebraska Court of Appeals· 1996-08-06· cited 6×
- State v. SchmidtNebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-06-03· cited 5×
- State v. HalcombNebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-04-06· cited 2×
- State v. DubrayNebraska Supreme Court· 2014-10-10
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-04-23· cited 1,983×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- Willie v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-07-24· cited 380×
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- People v. BoydeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-08-11· cited 142×
- Castro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-10-06· cited 104×
- H-CHH Associates v. Citizens for Representative GovernmentSupreme Court· 1988-03-21· cited 91×
- State v. HaynieNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-11-15· cited 75×
- Szoke v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 74×
- State v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 68×
- State v. AbdouchNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-01-20· cited 63×
- State v. HankinsNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 63×
- State v. MeltonNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 53×
- People v. ConteMichigan Supreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 46×
- State v. DixonNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-05-23· cited 38×
- State v. RobertsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-04-26· cited 37×
- State v. NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-02-07· cited 36×
- Roosevelt Tippitt v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsEighth Circuit· 1988-11-22· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.