Washington Supreme Court· 6/11/2015
State v. Jones
Citations
- 183 Wash. 2d 327
- 352 P.3d 776
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the lack of additional defense witnesses likely affected the outcome of the trial, where the State presented five witnesses and the defense presented only one
- for defense counsel to be effective, counsel must investigate the case, which includes interviewing witnesses
- \reasonable probability\ means \by less than a more likely than not standard\
- \'reasonable probability'\ means \by less than a more likely than not standard\
- \'reasonable probability'\ means \by less than a more likely than not standard\
- failure to interview a particular witness can constitute deficient performance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BertrandWashington Supreme Court· 2024-04-18· cited 75×
- State Of Washington v. Adrian Munoz RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-29· cited 72×
- State v. DrathCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-12-27· cited 20×
- Fortune v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2017-04-04· cited 13×
- State Of Washington v. Charles BlufordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-08-29· cited 5×
- State of Washington v. Zachary P. BergstromCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-10-15· cited 4×
- State Of Washington v. Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-06-27· cited 3×
- Daniel L. Fortune v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2017-04-04· cited 1×
- State v. EstesWashington Supreme Court· 2017-06-08
- State v. Salgado-MendozaWashington Supreme Court· 2017-10-12
- State v. BuckmanWashington Supreme Court· 2018-02-01
- State Of Washington, V Orlena Rae DrathCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-12-27
- State Of Washington, V Albert K. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-01-23
- State Of Washington, V. Jerry George Wood, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-11-08
- State Of Washington, V. Mitchell HengCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2022-07-11
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-04· cited 686×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-04· cited 682×
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 399×
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1994-04-04· cited 370×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 355×
- State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 310×
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 303×
- Jesus Avila v. George M. Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2002-07-22· cited 207×
- Jerry Bartlett JONES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1997-06-12· cited 191×
- State v. MorleyWashington Supreme Court· 1998-03-12· cited 173×
- State v. RayWashington Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 172×
- In re the Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 168×
- In Re Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 165×
- Victor Eugene Rios v. Teresa Rocha, WardenNinth Circuit· 2002-07-31· cited 164×
- James Nealy v. Donald A. Cabana, Superintendent of Mississippi State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1985-07-12· cited 152×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.