Washington Supreme Court· 1/21/2010

State v. Kelley

Citations

168 Wash. 2d 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the imposition of a firearm enhancement does not violate double jeopardy when an element of the underlying offense is use of a firearm
holding that the imposition of a firearm enhancement does not violate double jeopardy when an element of the underlying offense is use of a firearm
noting that double jeopardy claims utilizing the test from Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), are questions of law
stating the Nguyen court \appropriately concluded\ that such arguments are meritless and extending the Nguyen court's analysis to preclude similar reliance on Apprendi and Ring [4]
stating the Nguyen court “appropriately concluded” that such arguments are meritless and extending the Nguyen court’s analysis to preclude similar reliance on Apprendi and Ring 4
“Expression of one thing in a statute implies exclusion of others, and this exclusion is presumed to be deliberate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Sanders, Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.