Washington Supreme Court· 10/13/1994

State v. Russell

Citations

882 P.2d 747
125 Wash. 2d 24
63 U.S.L.W. 2291
1994 Wash. LEXIS 635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Frye standard did not apply where computer programs listing various characteristics of homicides were “nothing more than sophisticated record-keeping systems”
holding that the Frye standard did not apply where computer programs listing various characteristics of homicides were \nothing more than sophisticated record-keeping systems\
holding that general acceptance under Frye of PCR kit was not required because the kit is simply one tool for carrying out generally accepted PCR methodology
concluding that introduction of certain statistical probability evidence did not implicate Frye; computer programs were \nothing more than sophisticated record-keeping systems\
concluding that a Gunwall analysis does not support extending greater protection through article I, section 9 than provided by its federal counterpart
explaining that risk of joinder causing jury confusion is very small where the defense as to each charge is the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen, Andersen, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

284 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

107 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Russell

400 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.