Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/10/1999
State v. Ray
Citations
- 990 P.2d 365
- 164 Or. App. 145
- 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the determination of whether a defendant has abandoned a constitutionally protected privacy interest after lawful police conduct turns on whether the defendant intended to forgo the exercise of his or her possessory and privacy interests
- noting that the determination of whether a defendant has abandoned a constitutionally protected privacy interest after lawful police conduct turns on whether the defendant intended to forgo the exercise of his or her possessory and privacy interests
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Deits, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.